US Edition
Minnesota Star TribuneThursday, 2 April 2026
Click image to view full size
Justices seem set to reject birthright citizenship shift
Supreme Court questions Trump's challenge to long-established meaning of 14th Amendment.
The paper frames the Supreme Court hearing procedurally, focusing on the justices' skepticism toward the executive action rather than the political debate surrounding the policy itself.
The US Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments regarding an executive challenge to the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born on US soil. The outcome will fundamentally affect immigration law and the legal status of children born to non-citizens.
“long-established meaning”
“Protective of established legal norms”
Minnesota a template for a wider fraud fight
The state has become Trump's "poster child" as he targets others.
Examines how federal authorities are using Minnesota's state benefit administration as a justification for a broader national task force.
Trump seeks federal control of mail voting; legality questioned
Reports on a new executive order regarding election administration while immediately centering legal doubts from experts.
Who gets to park in front of your house? An old Twin Cities debate flares anew.
Provides a highly localized, community-focused look at neighborhood disputes over street parking.
More from Minnesota Star Tribune
Front page image reproduced for the purpose of critical review and commentary — about our editorial use.