US Edition

Philadelphia InquirerWednesday, 27 May 2026

Click image to view full size

After 28 years, three men cleared of murder

A judge vacated the convictions of Marc Brittingham, Rasheed Smith, and Jermal Shuler over evidence deemed unreliable.

How they framed it

The paper focuses on the legal system's correction of a long-standing error, emphasizing the duration of the injustice and the specific failure of evidence.

Context

Three Philadelphia men spent nearly three decades in prison for a 1997 killing before a judge vacated their convictions due to unreliable testimony and an inaccurate medical timeline. The case highlights ongoing efforts by the Conviction Integrity Unit to review historical cases for potential miscarriages of justice.

Striking phrase

evidence deemed unreliable

clearedmurderunreliable
Editorial Stance
← LeftCentreRight →
Focused on institutional accountability
Tonemeasured and detail-oriented
Reader emotionreassurance
Also on the front page

S.C. senate rejects Trump’s call to redraw districts amid primary

A federal panel blocked Alabama from using a new Republican-drawn map. A Florida map was approved.

Meg Kinnard and Jeffrey Collins and Kim Chandler and David A. Lieb

Reports on a state legislature's resistance to a federal redistricting request.

Also on the front page

Leader of Philly’s Panthers says city violating his right to bear arms

Police revoked Paul Birdsong’s license to carry firearms in what he contends was an unconstitutional act.

Focuses on a local constitutional dispute over firearm license revocation.

Also on the front page

Iran condemns strikes, accuses U.S. of ‘bad faith and unreliability’

Iranian authorities began restoring internet access to residents and businesses after a monthslong outage.

Covers international tensions and the restoration of internet access following unrest in Iran.

14 other papers on this dateView all US front pages — Wednesday, 27 May 2026

More from Philadelphia Inquirer

Front page image reproduced for the purpose of critical review and commentary — about our editorial use.